Post by account_disabled on Dec 27, 2023 21:11:17 GMT -6
Asubsequent amendments and additions not being included in the scope of material competence of the supreme court nor is an appeal in the interest of the law with a similar object pending. As for the condition of the newness of the legal issue whose principle solution is requested the practice of the High Court of Cassation and Justice in the application of art. of the Code of Civil Procedure is outlined in the sense that this condition of admissibility is considered to be met when the legal issue has its source in the.
Newly entered into force regulations but also if it concerns an older Country Email List regulation on which the court is called upon to rule on at present thus becoming actual the requirement of interpretation and application of the respective law for example Decision no. of February published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of April Decision No. of February published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I No. of April Decision No. of February published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of April . From this point of view there is no of the condition as long as the interpretation of a rule of a law in force is requested in the context of the entry into force of the.
Civil Code. Moreover the examination of the jurisprudence of the courts reveals that a unitary and constant jurisprudence has not been formed in relation to the question of law whose clarification is requested. As there is a risk of a nonuniform practice the issuance of a preliminary ruling is an effective remedy for its removal. The condition that the substantive resolution of the pending case depends on the legal issue whose clarification is requested is also fulfilled since in the procedural framework outlined.
Newly entered into force regulations but also if it concerns an older Country Email List regulation on which the court is called upon to rule on at present thus becoming actual the requirement of interpretation and application of the respective law for example Decision no. of February published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of April Decision No. of February published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I No. of April Decision No. of February published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of April . From this point of view there is no of the condition as long as the interpretation of a rule of a law in force is requested in the context of the entry into force of the.
Civil Code. Moreover the examination of the jurisprudence of the courts reveals that a unitary and constant jurisprudence has not been formed in relation to the question of law whose clarification is requested. As there is a risk of a nonuniform practice the issuance of a preliminary ruling is an effective remedy for its removal. The condition that the substantive resolution of the pending case depends on the legal issue whose clarification is requested is also fulfilled since in the procedural framework outlined.